Random: January 2005 Archives

How queer

|
In the news today...
A University of Central Oklahoma student group is planning what it calls "Straight Pride Week" on campus.

Members of the College Republicans said despite objections from some, they have every right to celebrate.

"The general gist is that if you are a straight student on campus be proud, be loud, this is your time to shine," said college Republican Kyle Houts.

The group has posted fliers on campus that read, "we're here, we're conservative, we're out."
I have an alternate slogan for them that I think may be more fitting:

"We're conservative! We're straight! We can't get a date!"

When headline writers go bad

|
In today's Chronicle Real Estate section, there's a story titled, "Separate, yet equal / 3 architects, 3 houses, same size, but designed for different buyers"

OK. Call me oversensitive, call me politically correct (I am from Berkeley, after all) but... doesn't that sound slightly, well, wrong? "Separate but equal" was the term used to refer to racial segregation in the bad old days in America, after all.

I was imagining other possibilities, though. Take a story about someone who keeps remodeling his or her house, and finally comes up with a design they like. "The Final Solution"! Or how people from different cultural backgrounds handle day-to-day tidying chores. "Ethnic Cleansing!"

Maybe I'm making too much of this. After all, I am the one who once suggested the headingline "ISH Happens" for a story about an international solar home show.

The Challenger explosion was NINETEEN YEARS AGO!?!?

|

Heh. :-)

|

Letter to the Oakland Tribune, January 28, 2005

Bush's war

SINCE WE KNOW that Iraq had no WMDs and no connection to al-Qaida, lumping it in with Afghanistan under the headline of "Terror war costs jump $80 billion" (Jan. 25) seems really wrong to me.

I know that the Tribune doesn't have a lot of room when writing headlines, so here's a suggestion: Replace "terror" with "Bush's." It takes up exactly the same amount of space and puts responsibility for this terrible mess squarely where it belongs.

Katherine Falk
Oakland

Various recent news about women

|
Harvard President Larry Summers made some remarks earlier this month to the effect that women were innately not as good as men at math and science, which set off a barrage of criticism. Deservedly so, for science doesn't back him up on this one, and the number of tenured professors at Harvard who are women has declined while he's been in office.
"It's just hard to avoid the conclusion that things have gotten worse in the last few years, and there's a climate of suspicion that we're going to appoint unqualified women, rather than a wholehearted search for the outstanding ones that are out there," said government and sociology professor Theda Skocpol. "Every time Summers talks about this issue he manages to share his worries that we might appoint unqualified women."

Others, however, say Harvard's administration has been lackluster on this issue for far longer than Summers' tenure.
The ongoing violence in the runup to the Iraqi election has dire implications for everyone, but are women bearing the brunt of the turmoil? Seems like it, according to women's rights activist Zainab Salbi:

The violence, Salbi says, has consequences far beyond the personal tragedies. It has driven many of Iraq's most prominent and talented women into their homes and out of public life, just when their participation in reconstructing the country is so crucial...

"I call it Code Orange in Iraq right now,'' said Salbi, president of Women for Women International, the D.C.-based organization she founded 10 years ago. "Women are barometers for how a society is going. Bad things in a society always start with women, and good things, too.''

She cites the Taliban as an example. When women were being persecuted, few paid any attention.

"People saw it as something that just impacted women,'' she said. "So we left it alone.''

But eventually the violence spread, turning Afghanistan into a toxic culture that bred a brand of terrorism that landed on our own doorstep. "In hindsight, you can see how it all started with women. I see it in all these places, a pattern that starts with women and spreads. Women are the softest door. The kitchen door. Nobody pays attention when it's opened.''

There's some hope.

Even those opposed to the prolonged presence of American forces say they have more freedom now. Karima Hashim Muhammad, an artist in her 40s, said she has "more personal freedom than before in spite of the (U.S.) occupation, which sooner or later will depart."

She said that when Saddam was in power she was afraid to exhibit work that the government might disapprove of. "I had a feeling that I was under observation."

Now teaching at an arts institute, she said she admires her fellow women candidates and believes many of them share the same goals -- even those representing the country's Islamic-based parties.

"We develop a kind understanding and admiration for each other," Muhammad said. "The difference between us is only that they are veiled and I am not."

Meanwhile, over at Guantanamo, women interrogators used sexual tactics to try to break their captives' wills.

Female interrogators tried to break Muslim detainees at the U.S. prison camp in Guantanamo Bay by sexual touching, wearing a miniskirt and thong underwear and in one case smearing a Saudi man's face with fake menstrual blood, according to an insider's written account.

---

Suspected Sept. 11 hijacker Hani Hanjour received pilot instruction for three months in 1996 and in December 1997 at a flight school in Scottsdale, Ariz.

"His female interrogator decided that she needed to turn up the heat," Saar writes, saying she repeatedly asked the detainee who had sent him to Arizona, telling him he could "cooperate" or "have no hope whatsoever of ever leaving this place or talking to a lawyer."'

The man closed his eyes and began to pray, Saar writes.

The female interrogator wanted to "break him," Saar adds, describing how she removed her uniform top to expose a tight-fitting T-shirt and began taunting the detainee, touching her breasts, rubbing them against the prisoner's back and commenting on his apparent erection.

The detainee looked up and spat in her face, the manuscript recounts.

The interrogator left the room to ask a Muslim linguist how she could break the prisoner's reliance on God. The linguist told her to tell the detainee that she was menstruating, touch him, then make sure to turn off the water in his cell so he couldn't wash.

Strict interpretation of Islamic law forbids physical contact with women other than a man's wife or family, and with any menstruating women, who are considered unclean.

"The concept was to make the detainee feel that after talking to her he was unclean and was unable to go before his God in prayer and gain strength," says the draft, stamped "Secret."

The interrogator used ink from a red pen to fool the detainee, Saar writes.

Why does it feel like we're going BACKWARDS?!?!

The things you learn...

|
While researching quotes from famous Jewish women, I learned that the first woman rabbi in America (and the world?), Ray Frank lived in Oakland! Pretty cool.

Deep thoughts

|
Why do so many spammers assume that 1) It's the goal of every man to produce great shooting gobs of spermatazoa, 2) men's partners strongly applaud this endeavor and 3) I'm male? It's so sexist, I tell you. Not to mention somewhat messy (I just had to remove dozens, if not hundreds, of spams on the subject.)

What is wrong with Joe Leiberman? The Hubble telescope couldn't figure out what planet he lives on.

"I've always believed that our responsibility to advise and consent does not mean that we have to agree with every opinion or every action that the nominee has ever taken," Lieberman said in his opening remarks.

"Our responsibility is to determine whether the nominee is fit for the position ... and whether the nominee, in our judgment, will serve in the national interest. And of course I conclude that Dr. Condoleezza Rice meets that standard at least and much more."

Why didn't I go to law school? Is this not the best legal headline ever?

5th Circuit Rules in Rappers' Battle Over Phrase 'Back That Ass Up'

OK, back to work.

Sticks and stones

|
From the Advocate:
"No Name-calling Week" takes aim at insults of all kinds, whether based on a child's appearance, background, or behavior. But a handful of conservative critics have zeroed in on the references to harassment based on sexual orientation. "I hope schools will realize it's less an exercise in tolerance than a platform for liberal groups to promote their pansexual agenda," said Robert Knight, director of Concerned Women for America's Culture and Family Institute.
I agree we should not ban name-calling. Because if we did, I wouldn't be able to call Robert Knight and the other members of Concerned Women "Troglodyte, anal-retentive, homophobic, mindless, inhumane, joy-sucking zombies who dishonor the religion and culture they claim to represent."

That, or winners of the "Taliban impersonation contest."

Also, their mother was a hamster and their father smelt of elderberries!

PPPPPPPPPPPPPTTTT!

No WAY!!!

|
Two pieces of news, each shocking in its own way. (And I'm not even talking about the latest revelation's of Rummy's super-secret spy group that he hid from Congress and the CIA.)

From Pew's new study:
Internet users are extremely positive about search engines and the experiences they have when searching the internet. But these same satisfied internet users are generally unsophisticated about why and how they use search engines. They are also strikingly unaware of how search engines operate and how they present their results.

Internet users behave conservatively as searchers: They tend to settle quickly on a single search engine and then stick with it, rather than switching as search technology evolves or comparing results from different search systems. Some 44% of searchers regularly use just one engine, and another 48% use just two or three. Nearly half of searchers use a search engines no more than a few times a week, and two-thirds say they could walk away from search engines without upsetting their lives very much.

I have trouble believing that. Partly it's because I'm such a Google whore myself. I joke that I don't actually know anything; I just know where to look it up online.

But (and admittedly, I haven't read the whole thing so I don't know their methodology) I wonder if it's a vocabulary problem. I've been talking to people on the phone at work and trying to talk them through the process of uploading files via their web browser. The problem is, you ask them what program they're using and they say "Yahoo!" or "Comcast!" They don't understand how all the pieces fit together. I think they just fire up their computers and then click on an on their desktop to get online. They then get the default start page their ISP has set up. That page has a search box on it.

So they're probably using search all the time, but they aren't thinking, "OK, now I'm using Google..." However, if their ISP were to cancel their contracts with Google, Yahoo, etc. and take away their little box, I bet they'd notice!

The other one was this report from CBS:

A recent study by researchers at the University of Washington found that 1 in 50 people die within one month of having gastric bypass surgery, and that figure jumps nearly fivefold if the surgeon is inexperienced.

Yikes. Those are terrible odds, and yet the surgery's popularity keeps increasing...

AFA and meta tags

|
I was amused to look at the American Family Association's website and peek at their meta tags:
<meta name="description" content="The American Family Association exists to motivate and equip citizens to change the culture to reflect Biblical truth and traditional family values.">

<meta name="keywords" content="Judeo-Christian Values,family values,traditional values,afa,american family association,traditional values,don wildmon,morals,moral,morality,law policy,local affiliates,government affairs,foundation,afr,radio,Journal,pornography,homosexual agenda,pro-life,entertainment,television,radio, Christian,conservative,activism,legislative action,Tupelo,Mississippi">

So remember, folks, when you think of "pornography" or the "homosexual agenda", think "Tupelo, Mississippi"!

Oh, what the heck was I doing on their site, anyway?

Well, see, I got this email:

In November 2004, the FCC cut a backroom deal with CBS and its parent company Viacom.

In summary, Viacom agreed to donate a paltry $3.5 million to the FCC in exchange for dropping thousands of indecency complaints filed against it by taxpaying consumers.

Basically, the FCC cut a deal with CBS. What was the result? CBS immediately went back to their standard fare of lewd and indecency programs.

On December 31, 2004, CBS re-aired an episode of Without A Trace, complete with an extended teen-age orgy scene. The original broadcast of this episode had thousands of FCC complaints against it, which were tossed out in the November FCC/CBS "back-scratching" deal.

Click here to view the abominable Without A Trace scene for yourself! Be warned, it contains offensive and graphic scenes.

Because of these kinds of backdoor deals, the FCC continues to allow networks like CBS to flood the airwaves with indecency.

I'm asking you to do two things that I believe will start the ball rolling in the right direction.

1. Tell the FCC Commissioners to stop cutting deals with broadcasters of indecent material.

2. File a formal indecency complaint with the FCC against CBS' broadcast of Without A Trace.

I tried to click to see the abominable video, but darn it, it was in Windows Media format. Which is abominable in and of itself.

Anyway, maybe we should all tell the FCC to keep up the good work! More porn, please!

And if the AFA doesn't like what they see on TV, they could maybe do what I do... not watch.

So hip (and goofy) it hurts

|
Got some extra cash lying around? Then you need...

A toilet tank aquarium called "Aquariass". (From UrbanPeel)
Aquarium toilet tank

Slightly more strapped for cash? Then perhaps "Darth Tater" is your thing... (From Starwars.com)

Dark Tater

Spam, and my next band name

|
"macrame deity". Tee hee...

"Where are today's voices of moral outrage?"

|

Never since his assassination in 1968 have I felt the absence of Martin Luther King more acutely. Where are today's voices of moral outrage? Where is the leadership willing to stand up and say: Enough! We've sullied ourselves enough.

I'm convinced, without being able to prove it, that those voices will emerge. There was a time when no one had heard of Dr. King. Or Oscar Arias Sanchez. Or Martin O'Brien, who founded the foremost human rights organization in Northern Ireland, and who tells us: "The worst thing is apathy - to sit idly by in the face of injustice and to do nothing about it."

Bob Herbert in the NY TImes

Prince Harry Fracas

|
OK, not that I really care that much (again, why does the world need the British Royal Family?) but did you know that the party Prince Harry got up in Nazi costume for was called...

'Natives and Colonials'?

I'd like to know if somebody dressed up as King Leopold of Belgium. He was responsible for the deaths of millions of Africans in the Congo. Or a soldier during the Boer War in South Africa. How about a figure in Algeria before the war for independence?

Good times...

Religion that's not so f***d up

|
This is more like it.
In our text, God does not say, Ã ¬Go [away from Me] to the wicked Pharaoh, Ã ® but ¬Come to Pharaoh,Ã Ã ® as if in coming toward Pharaoh, Moses would be, paradoxically, coming closer to God. The rebbe emphasizes the classic Chassidic teaching that God is present in every person, in every moment of experience, in all of life. God, then, is present in Pharaoh: in the tyrant, in the enemy, even in the raw face of evil. Still, God says, Ã ¬Come to Me, even when I am hidden deep within the face of your enemy, so veiled by layers of hurt and distortion that you cannot recognize Me. Ã ®
Hell, even Rabbi Boteach, of all people, gets it.

The human imperative is not to reckon with God à ­s secrets but to promote those values that He conveyed as being supreme, leading with the defense of human life.

Judaism sees death, illness and suffering as aberrations in creation. Suffering is not redemptive and affliction is not cleansing.

In Judaism, unlike in Christianity, nobody needs to die in order to bring about atonement for sin. Man à ­s mission is not to make peace with pain and await a better existence in the afterlife. Rather, we seek to perfect this world by filling in for God whenever He chooses to be overtly absent.

At the risk of offending my Muslim and Christian colleagues, I fully affirm that any doctor, even an atheist, who struggles to cure AIDS and save life is doing far more Godly work than a cleric who sacrilegiously asserts that the disease is a divine affliction for sexual sin.

Your religion is f**d up (VERY long rant)

|
What do these stories have in common?

From the Chronicle:

A federal judge Thursday ordered a suburban Atlanta school system to remove stickers from its high school biology textbooks that call evolution "a theory, not a fact," saying the disclaimers are an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

 "By denigrating evolution, the school board appears to be endorsing the well-known prevailing alternative theory, creationism or variations thereof, even though the sticker does not specifically reference any alternative theories," U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper said.

 The stickers were put inside the books' front covers by public school officials in Cobb County in 2002. They read: "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."
From the Washington Times:
Mr. Bush said he leans heavily on his religion every day that he is in the Oval Office and cannot imagine any man handling the pressures of the job without leaning on God.
   
"I fully understand that the job of the president is and must always be protecting the great right of people to worship or not worship as they see fit," Mr. Bush said. "That's what distinguishes us from the Taliban. The greatest freedom we have or one of the greatest freedoms is the right to worship the way you see fit.
   
"On the other hand, I don't see how you can be president at least from my perspective, how you can be president, without a relationship with the Lord," he said.
This book review by Andrew Sullivan in the New York Times
How do you break these people? According to the I.C.R.C., one prisoner ''alleged that he had been hooded and cuffed with flexicuffs, threatened to be tortured and killed, urinated on, kicked in the head, lower back and groin, force-fed a baseball which was tied into the mouth using a scarf and deprived of sleep for four consecutive days. Interrogators would allegedly take turns ill-treating him. When he said he would complain to the I.C.R.C. he was allegedly beaten more. An I.C.R.C. medical examination revealed hematoma in the lower back, blood in urine, sensory loss in the right hand due to tight handcuffing with flexicuffs, and a broken rib.''

Even Bybee's very narrow definition of torture would apply in this case. Here's another - not from Abu Ghraib:

A detainee ''had been hooded, handcuffed in the back, and made to lie face down, on a hot surface during transportation. This had caused severe skin burns that required three months' hospitalization. . . . He had to undergo several skin grafts, the amputation of his right index finger, and suffered . . . extensive burns over the abdomen, anterior aspects of the outer extremities, the palm of his right hand and the sole of his left foot.''

And another, in a detainee's own words: ''They threw pepper on my face and the beating started. This went on for a half hour. And then he started beating me with the chair until the chair was broken. After that they started choking me. At that time I thought I was going to die, but it's a miracle I lived. And then they started beating me again. They concentrated on beating me in my heart until they got tired from beating me. They took a little break and then they started kicking me very hard with their feet until I passed out.''
This other article in the Times
Always, there is a search for signs, as in the conviction of Rose Jayasuriya, 59, that her older sister Patricia, 74, still missing, died blessed because she had just taken communion when the sea invaded their church. Sri Lankan Buddhists believe that rebirth follows death, and that sin and good deeds determine one's future in this life and the next. Many Buddhists said they suspected that those who had lost children had done something wrong in a previous life.

M. Vilmot, 49, a baker whose 14 family members survived, was sure that those who had lost loved ones were being punished for some sin.

"We earn money the correct way," he said. "That's why it didn't happen to us." His bakery, perhaps 30 feet from the sea, was damaged but not destroyed. He said he followed the five Theravada Buddhist precepts of not lying, stealing, drinking, philandering or killing animals, while others only gave money to temples and then misbehaved."
So what do all these stories really have in common? For me, the answer is, "They all show the limits of religious faith."

What do I mean? I'll try to explain...

It seems that everywhere outside of my little liberal enclave, people treat certain kinds of religious faith as an absolute good. Believe in G*d and follow the rules.

So how does someone of such great religious faith get from point A to point B? Particularly when point B seems to involve condoning torture? Or telling your neighbors that they lost their children because they sinned? Or sending soldiers off to die for what is clearly a mistake? Or, less life-or-death, teach kids that the scientific method is hooey? How does promoting a narrow set of "Christian values" (or Muslim, or Buddist, or Jewish) become the most important thing? Who gets to decide what those values are?

As I type this, I feel some hesitation. Who am I to say which set of values should be most important? How do I know what values are "universally accepted?" Isn't it all just my narrow perspective? I start feeling like a very naive kid who can only repeat, "BUT IT'S WRONG! IT JUST IS!!!" over and over. Which isn't very convincing.

And yet, every religious faith (in its better moments) seems to strike the same notes. Try to not do harm, obey your higher power, whatever that is, tradition is important, killing is bad, except when it's necessary...

I am not exactly a religious person. I'm not exactly an atheist either. I do believe it's important to believe in something bigger than yourself, or you'll feel that life is pointless (and yes, you do have to have a "big picture" perspective to be president... but I don't see how Bush has got one). Maybe that "bigger" thing is G*d. Maybe it's just the planet. I don't know.

It's crazy to me to see people reject science because the scientific writings contradict the Word of the Lord. How small-minded. Why can they not think, "Wow, G*d is concerned with bigger things than whether or not George W. Bush gets reelected... he can move whole continents! He set in motion powerful forces like evolution!" How can you refuse to learn something new about how amazing this world is? If you believe G*d created us, you must believe s/he gave us minds to use.

I don't care what the religion in question is. If your religion tells you it's OK to treat some people like inanimate objects to be kicked around, your religion is f**ked up. If your religion tells you it's OK to set off explosions that kill people indiscriminately, your relgion is f**ked up. If your religion tells you that people who have bad things happen to them are only getting what they deserve, your religion is f**ked up. If your religion tells you not to expose yourself to other ideas, your relgion is f**ed up.

Just my opinion, of course...

Random pictures from San Jose

|
rotting movie poster
Rotting movie poster
detail of a sculpture
Closeup of a cool sculpture

Closeup of tile on the outside of a nightclub
 
Closeup of another cool sculpture

So-called security

|
OK, I'm really glad Social Security doesn't print your full SS# on their statements. Because this year, I didn't get my statement, I got Gregory M-----------'s. Oddly enough, it was addressed to me on the front.

This Greg dude was also born in March, though a few years before me. His work history seems similar, based on his income. But he makes a lot more than me now, and has paid more into Social Security... which is what clued me into the fact that I wasn't looking at my records.

So does that mean he's reading my records right now? How many other people got the wrong statement too?

Idiots.

Oh, and I really, really loved listening to the on-hold messages about how we need to do Something to fix Social Security. My tax dollars at work again?

To reiterate: idiots.

For those in the East Bay: See Bright River

|
I went to see Travelling Jewish Theatre's Bright River at the Julia Morgan Theater last night. It's a bit hard to describe. Technically, I suppose it's a play, but it's more like storytelling set to music, though without being a musical. All the spoken performance is done by one person, the play's author, who mostly plays a detective who goes into the Afterlife to try to find a cop's daugher who died grieving over her soldier boyfriend, who was killed in Iraq. He also does monologues from the point of view of the soldier and a demon.

Very simple set, no costumes to speak of apart from a hat and basic clothes (and I have to confess to being mesmerized/distracted by a patch of sweat that stained the lead guy's t-shirt right on the belly-button about halfway through the play.)

The most extraordinary part of the show is the music. There's a bassist, a violinist, and the main guy plays the flute. But he doesn't just play the flute - he makes mouth noises on it, in such a way that he's playing percussion and melody at the same time. It's very cool. The others create interesting and beautiful noises with their instruments as well. At one point, they also pick up water bottles and blow on the tops. Who needs Pan flutes?

The real ace in the hole is "Kid Beyond", AKA Andrew Chaiken, formerly of the HouseJacks, though the program bio doesn't mention that band.  Last time I saw him, he was performing with them in a reunion concert, and the crowd went crazy during his solo. He is even more amazing now. No longer limited to being a hip-hop human drum machine, he sang in a high, ethereal voice, impersonated a gun battle, portrayed a bouncer at a bird conference (don't ask me to explain) and did a very convincing imitation of a bus station.

It's going to be at the Juiia Morgan for two more weeks, so check it out! (And Wednesdays and Thursdays are "pay what you can" nights...)

Can you repeat that?

|
Best headline I've ever seen, I think. The Onion couldn't have come up with better:

"Yellow Journalism Stains Third Annual Interfaith Pagan Parade and Celebration"

OK, so it's from a letter to the editor, not a news story. Still, gotta love the Daily Planet.

Cool new mural in our neighborhood

| | TrackBacks (0)
A muralist recently finished this project which commemorates the Key Line streetcar system in the East Bay. (One of the Key Line terminals was on Piedmont and 41st in Oakland). You can see it for yourself on the back wall of J. Hamburger (which used to be the station), by the parking lot...

 


 

What's wrong with this picture?

|
A popup window... advertising... popup blockers. Oy.

popup 
advertising popup blocker

Music I Listen To

 

Link Roller

Powered by Movable Type 4.2-en

Photos

DSCN4807.JPG DSCN4808.JPG DSCN4810.JPG DSCN4812.JPG DSCN4813.JPG DSCN4816.JPG

Books

Widget_logo

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Random category from January 2005.

Random: December 2004 is the previous archive.

Random: February 2005 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.