Random: July 2007 Archives

OK, now I really, really, really feel old

|

I remember the "Baby Jessica falls down a well" story quite well.

Did you know that she's now married and has a kid?

No, I didn't either.

Oy!

Choices have two sides...

|

Reading this discussion on Mother Talkers today made me think...

When you're a working parent, all too often, it seems that friction results. If you can't stay late because you have to get home before the babysitter leaves, or you have to work at home or miss a day because your child is sick, employers and coworkers may resent you for it. You CHOSE to have a child, after all. It was YOUR choice, and why should they have to be penalized with a heavier workload because you made that choice?

I would argue that NOT having children is also a choice. If you are in an opposite-sex relationship with no fertility problems, unless you've never, ever had sex with a fertile member of the opposite gender, you have indeed consciously chosen not to have children.

I don't want anyone to think I'm implying there's something wrong with that, because for many people, not having kids is absolutely the right thing for them. I'd just like to see everyone's choices respected, and I'd really like to see having kids treated as just part of life, not some extra-special or extra-annoying, inconvenient-for-the-rest-of-us thing.

(Hope I haven't just launched a flame war or offended anybody who is reading this -- this is definitely not about you!)

Dress Barn. Seriously. Dress Barn.

|

I love wearing dresses. Since I'm a slob who likes to throw clothing on without having to give the matter a lot of thought, and am now also a mother who gets dressed in a hurry while trying to appease the cranky small child, dresses are perfect for me. However, it's been difficult to find the right one lately. I'm still nursing, so the neckline has to be easy to open. Also, I like a particular style of dress, one that is somewhat fitted but not tight, and those seem to come and go. At the moment, they seem to be back in, but what looks good on the hanger doesn't necessarily look good on me (as I found when I tried on a dress at my sister-in-law's clothing store.)

So yesterday I'm coming back to my car from Long's, and I pause in front of Dress Barn. I've walked by it a million times, but have hardly ever gone in — they generally have tended to be as stylish as their name suggests, with lots of straight-waisted, big shoulder-padded, ugly-patterned belted numbers. Last time I went in one in the city a couple of years ago, there was one dress in the window that appealed, but again, it wasn't a good fit.

Not this time though! I don't know what happened to the place — new management? New designers? — but they had many really nice dresses, reasonably stylish patterns... and they fit me! I ended up buying two, for $34 each. And I did this despite the pushy sales people (who kept trying to get my to open a credit card account with them) and the insipid music. Go figure.

I guess they are doing something different — according to this Motley Fool article, they're making some dough off the new dresses.

I have two suggestions for them though. One is, do something about the website! It's worse than useless.

The second one is a marketing tag line. "Let yourself shine" is nice enough, but it doesn't really communicate the brand. My version: "Dress Barn. No shit." Is that a winner or what?

Music I Listen To

 

Link Roller

Powered by Movable Type 4.2-en

Photos

DSCN4807.JPG DSCN4808.JPG DSCN4810.JPG DSCN4812.JPG DSCN4813.JPG DSCN4816.JPG

Books

Widget_logo

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Random category from July 2007.

Random: June 2007 is the previous archive.

Random: August 2007 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.