Terrorism: March 2004 Archives

Iraq, the war on terror, and Europe...

| | TrackBacks (0)

From Time Magazine:

 Just as President Bush claims 9/11 "changed everything" in U.S. politics, so, too may the Madrid attacks mark a turning point in Europe's relationship to President Bush's war on terror. The continent's geographical proximity to the Arab world and its large — and mostly impoverished and marginalized — Arab immigrant populations make it especially vulnerable to terror attacks. Now that al-Qaeda and its supporters are directly attacking Europe's cities rather than simply using them as staging areas, European leaders are looking to ramp up their own efforts to fight terror. But as the Spanish election result shows, this may put them more sharply at odds with the Bush administration. That's because there's a widely held belief among the Europeans that while police and intelligence cooperation across the Atlantic (and across the Mediterranean, with Arab security services) has been highly effective in eliminating al-Qaeda cells, the U.S. invasion of Iraq has been not only ineffective, but actually counterproductive in the fight against terrorism. European Commission chief Romano Prodi argues that the use of military force as a prime weapon in the fight against terrorism is not working: "Terrorism is now more powerful than ever before," he says. And most European leaders believe the al-Qaeda phenomenon will not be defeated until the anti-U.S. grievances in the Arab world on which it feeds have been addressed.

 European Union security officials meet in Madrid on Friday to hammer out a strategy — a meeting in which the U.S. won't be participating. That's natural, of course, in that the U.S. is not part of the European Union. But it may also signal an intention by the Europeans to forge a more effective strategy for countering the al-Qaeda movement, and challenging the U.S. to rethink its own approach.

Doesn't sound like "appeasement" to me.

Oh, and I've decided that Andrew Sullivan deserves to be stuck with the far-right Republicans. With this kind of crap, he should feel uncomfortable. Shame on him for misusing Monty Python this way.

Anyway, we're now a year into the war in Iraq, and 2 1/2 years into the war on terror. Terror seems to be winning and I see nothing to celebrate. I hope 8 months from now we'll be celebrating a Democrat in the White House and the return of our sanity.

Spain and what it might mean

| | TrackBacks (0)


I started reading Andrew Sullivan recently for some reason (He is a Republican and I am most definitely not!) I found this column hard to shrug off... I fear that there will be an attack here before November, and that this is a leadup to it.

Some things Sullivan says I have to disagree on, of course.

if the appeasement brigade really do believe that the war to depose Saddam is and was utterly unconnected with the war against al Qaeda, then why on earth would al Qaeda respond by targeting Spain? If the two issues are completely unrelated, why has al Qaeda made the connection? The answer is obvious: the removal of the Taliban and the Saddam dictatorship were two major blows to the cause of Islamist terror. They removed an al Qaeda client state and a potential harbor for terrorists and weapons of mass destruction. So it's vital that the Islamist mass murderers target those who backed both wars. It makes total sense.

There is no evidence that Al Qaeda was in Iraq under Saddam. Sullivan's language is deliberately vague here. However, war supporters kept saying that this war was going to change the Middle East and make it safe for democracy, etc. What better way for Al Qaeda to say, "Not so fast, suckers!"

Sullivan also argues that the fact that the Socialists won in Spain as a result of the terrorist attack is a victory for Al Qaeda. But in Israel, the terrorist attacks caused the Likud party to rise to the top. In fact, every time there's movement towards peace, there's another suicide bombing, which reinforces the extremists on both sides and ensures that there will be no resolution. That certainly is a victory for the terrorists, and I'm not the only one who says so!

I think Americans would probably react differently to another attack, because the war in Iraq enjoyed higher support here at the time (and even now), whereas in Spain, 80% were opposed. You can't ignore your citizens to that extent and expect to retain your support. The moment there was a crisis, all the resentment from last year boiled over. It also didn't help that the government panicked and tried to blame ETA. It looked really bad. I'd like to think our leaders might learn something — lying to your voters is a bad idea — but I doubt it.

Here's a different take on the matter from somebody I agree with more frequently!, oh, and this (and a bunch of other postings from TalkLeft)

I really hope we don't have to find out what would happen, but I fear we will. This year scares me.

Bombing attacks in Spain

| | TrackBacks (0)

Rush-hour attacks in Madrid on the trains. 190 people killed, and counting. This is the second time in the last year that a place I visited has been attacked. Last year, it was Casablanca, when they attacked the hotel I stayed in five years ago. Michael and I were in Madrid last Christmas break.

A few random thoughts. It sounds like Al Queda. The Spanish government blames the ETA, but this doesn't match their modus operandi. The government supported the Bush administration's attack on Iraq, but the people sure didn't. Why do they have to suffer? Michael points out the date coincidence — March 11. Is this going to be us again in six months? Sooner?

Terrorists must be the biggest egomaniacs in the world. To think that their cause is so important that they can do these things? There are no words for it, and no justifications. And on a more selfish note, if they cause Bush to get reelected, I'm going to be exceedingly pissed off.

Music I Listen To

 

Link Roller

Powered by Movable Type 4.2-en

Photos

DSCN4807.JPG DSCN4808.JPG DSCN4810.JPG DSCN4812.JPG DSCN4813.JPG DSCN4816.JPG

Books

Widget_logo

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Terrorism category from March 2004.

Terrorism: December 2003 is the previous archive.

Terrorism: April 2004 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.